How to Cover Snaps for that Touch of Couture
October 19th, 2009 in sewing, tips & tricks, garment construction, fundamentalsSometimes the word “couture” implies difficult and time consuming. But it really stands for quality workmanship and, often, couture techniques are quite easy to do. A good example is the covered snap. In just an extra minute or two, you can add this elegant touch to a garment or accessory that requires a large snap closure.
![]() |
Each snap has two parts: male and female. |
To cover a snap:
1. Cut a circle of lightweight fabric about twice the diameter of the snap. Sew a row of running stitches near the edge of the circle.
![]() |
Cut a circle from lightweight fabric and sew running stitches around the outer edge. |
2. Work a small hole in the center of the snap and push the ball through it.
![]() |
In the center of the circle of fabric, make a small cut and work the ball of the snap through it. |
3. Pull up the thread to cover the snap and secure it in place to your garment.
![]() |
Pull up the stitches, wrapping the fabric around the snap. |
Work the female section of the snap in the same way. “Snapping” the sections together will push the fabric into the hole on this section.
















Comments (24)
And to those critical of the person who made the comments regarding terminology - did you not catch her "I say this tongue in cheek" comment? While it was an attempt at levity which failed - make sure you read all the way through! Posted: 12:05 pm on November 13th
BTW historically the use of the terms male and female is, and has been standard to describe any type of electric, audio, electronic, computer or manual connector, plug, snap etc. There are no "politically correct" replacement terms. In this day and age, it's hard to believe that anyone could be unaware of this. Posted: 12:05 pm on November 12th
As to the reference to the male and female components, This is the only way I have ever heard them referred to. If they were referred to in another way, no one would know what you were talking about. Posted: 12:19 pm on November 11th
As to the reference to the male and female components, This is the only way I have ever heard them referred to. If they were referred to in another way, no one would know what you were talking about. Posted: 12:18 pm on November 11th
as for the hole in question.. a stiletto will work a big enough hole and not require any additional work, fuss or expense.. Posted: 11:44 am on November 11th
Thank you MaryRay for this contribution...this is one of the many reasons I look to Threads as well, and have for many yrs. Posted: 9:22 pm on November 10th
Just because something isn't done the difficult way does not mean it was done with any less quality. I love the quality of techniques I have learned from Threads. Some people need to just get over themselves and enjoy sewing. Thanks for all the great ideas and skills I have learned from your magazine! Posted: 2:01 pm on November 10th
Excuuuuuuse meeeee.Who would fail to see the pornigraphic conotations of the piece with a ball, and the other piece coyly called the female piece, with one fitting in to the other. I am shocked! Please put a warning at the top of the page regarding sexual content!
Seriously though, aren't these terms a little sexist and outdated? How about the 'prong bit fited into the prong case? Oh I don't know. It's the same thing when you talk to an electrician or a mechanic. what devious mind started this in the first place. (By the way I say all this tongue in cheek) I love your magazine. Posted: 11:21 am on November 10th
I have been sewing since I was 7 and am now retired, but still love to be sewing more than any other hobby. Posted: 6:30 am on November 10th
Thank you,
Debra Posted: 7:44 pm on November 9th
idea and sure it will work. I have been sewing since the age of 7 years mostly on my own. My mother encouraged me
but was legally blind and unable to help. It is articles
like yours that continues to teach me and other that want
to try something new.. Posted: 6:37 pm on November 5th
[Sometimes the word “couture” implies difficult and time consuming.
But it really stands for quality workmanship..."]
This column is definitely not for Sewing 101.
We can get that on too many other sites.
I expect Threads to offer us TOP QUALITY Couture, for today's busy woman.
I was a subscriber from the very first issue in the 80s when I was a working woman.
Now that I have changed professions and am a Fiber Artist/Sole Proprietor of my own business, I value individual, hand's on QUALITY work even more.
Posted: 10:10 pm on October 22nd
They were made with respect as I would to any other professional; as I treat all individuals respectfully and appreciatively because we all have different points of view depending on our background and/or experience.
What I was referring to was the appearance of the loose threads laying alongside the snap's ball in image #2.
The easily-frayed cut edges of this particular material is in evidence in the last image as well, which lead me to think that a spreading of the warp and weft would serve the purpose better than cutting them.
Or, alternatively, if cutting is a must, then to suggest overcasting the cut edges with a fine thread, as I would worry about future unraveling at that spot in a garment that I was to wear, at the same time elevating it into the realm of Hand-Made rather than Home-Made.
To me, anything that can be done as a preventative rather than as a later 'fix', is far better. Once threads begin to fray out of a close-set area like this it's almost impossible to put them back into their original positions.
My comments were directed toward - - '...an ounce of Prevention..."
It's perhaps a mountain out of a molehill, but isn't it "all in the details"?
And I am somewhat tongue-in-cheek, as I take all sewing and needlework seriously but don't wish to upset anyone here by posting.
Please forgive me if this is toe-stepping!!!
Posted: 7:37 pm on October 22nd
formation in it.
I am sure there are times that someone doesn't agree with the way something is done, but please be polite in the way that you submit your comment! Posted: 5:07 pm on October 21st
Thank you all for paying attention, keeping me on track, and most of all for being such loyal Threads readers and fans. Posted: 6:18 pm on October 20th
I was also initially puzzled by the Americanised language - & had to investigate 'snaps'- which we call press studs!!
Posted: 1:56 am on October 20th
Posted: 10:53 pm on October 19th
This is a guaranteed weak spot (quickly fraying out) and it will positively scream Home-made!
I've used this technique successfully many times with many weights of fabric; an awl will gently spread the threads apart to push the ball through and on the female side, very short sts around the circle will hold the warp and weft threads back out of the way.
Please don't talk down to us and take the easy, kindergarten way out.
We look to Threads for short cuts, but also for QUALITY! Posted: 10:04 pm on October 19th